Zuckerberg denies that Fb prioritizes earnings over consumer security

Mark Zuckerberg, chief government officer and founding father of Fb Inc., speaks throughout a Home Power and Commerce Committee listening to in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Wednesday, April 11, 2018.

Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Pictures

Fb CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Tuesday lastly addressed the collection of claims made by whistleblower Frances Haugen, denying that the social media firm prioritizes its earnings over the protection of its customers.

“On the coronary heart of those accusations is this concept that we prioritize revenue over security and well-being,” Zuckerberg mentioned in a submit on his Fb profile. “That is simply not true.”

Zuckerberg’s feedback come after almost a month of experiences out of the Wall Road Journal which have relied on inner Fb analysis offered to the publication by Haugen, who left the social media firm in Could. The tales have highlighted quite a few issues on Fb’s providers that the corporate is conscious of however both ignores or doesn’t resolve. This consists of analysis that reveals Fb is conscious that Instagram is detrimental to the psychological well being of youngsters.

“Of every little thing revealed, I am significantly targeted on the questions raised about our work with children,” Zuckerberg mentioned. “I’ve spent a number of time reflecting on the sorts of experiences I need my children and others to have on-line, and it is essential to me that every little thing we construct is secure and good for teenagers.”

Zuckerberg’s submit comes after Haugen spent Tuesday morning on Capitol Hill testifying earlier than senators on either side of the aisles on the issues the social media firm creates for society.

With out referring to Haugen, Zuckerberg mentioned “lots of the claims do not make any sense.” Zuckerberg additionally mentioned that “The argument that we intentionally push content material that makes individuals indignant for revenue is deeply illogical.”

Zuckerberg additionally known as on Congress to replace web rules that decide what age teenagers ought to be allowed to make use of web providers, how tech firms ought to confirm customers’ ages and the way firms ought to stability giving children privateness whereas giving dad and mom visibility to their youngsters’s on-line exercise.

“Just like balancing different social points, I do not consider non-public firms ought to make all the choices on their very own,” he wrote. “That is why we’ve got advocated for up to date web rules for a number of years now.”

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.